This essay attempts to provide a structured and up-to-date outline of the topic. The First World War was a conflict of unprecedented scale and the debate as to the most important reason for its outbreak has polarised historians for decades. The conflict had immediate causes in the short-term, but was also the culmination of over a century of socioeconomic and political change. Nationalism, born out of the French Revolution, spread rapidly across Europe, and the rise of Germany destabilised the geopolitical status quo, whilst a dangerous web of alliances spanning the European continent was constructed.
To what extent can it be said that the First World War was caused by the alliance system? From Paper II Topic 1: Causes, practices and effects of war Essay I: An observer to international relations today, will absolutely see the alliance system in use, very similarly to what it was like in the late s and early s.
America, on the other hand has shown that they are determined to give repercussions for the use of chemical weapons on the rebels and civilians alike. As time went on, Britain dropped support of America and denied using their military against Syria, while France is dwindling on supporting America.
This will start off by examining how the alliance system of the late s and early s caused World War I and later on discus other opinions and reasons why it did not cause the war. By two opposing sides of Europe were created. When the Archduke was assassinated, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia.
This should have been a war only between two nations, but with the alliances in place, Germany had to support Austria-Hungary as it had formed an Alliance with them. Now the other two countries in the Triple Alliance will be dragged into the war as well as they were together with Russia and promised to protect one another.
Later on, even Japan got involved, even though it was half across the world, due to an Alliance with Britain. It can be said that the Alliance between Germany and Austria-Hungary caused the war as well. At the time, the newly unified Germany was the super power of Europe.
Austria-Hungary on the other hand, was falling apart and suffering from an unhappy populace due to rivalry between different races, as formally it was a collection of many different Eastern European states.
This article offers an overview of the progress of nationalism and the national idea starting with its origins as a mass political programme during the French Revolution and tracing its passage up to the beginning of the First World War. Apr 25, · 6. Essay About Nationalism Nationalism: Capitalism and Global Capitalism. Global Capitalism Capitalism is an economic system that is based on private ownership of the means of production and the creation of goods and services for profit. Nationalism is a political, social, and economic system characterized by the promotion of the interests of a particular nation, especially with the aim of gaining and maintaining sovereignty (self-governance) over the timberdesignmag.com political ideology of nationalism holds that a nation should govern itself, free from outside interference and is linked to the concept of self-determination.
One could say it was suffering from an identity crisis at the time of the war. The alliance with the strong Germany, gave Austria-Hungary the confidence and power it needed to go to war with Serbia.
Without Germany on its side, Austria-Hungary knew that going to war would be a death sentence, especially with Russia on the Serbs side.
If Germany did not have an alliance with Austria-Hungary, they most likely would not declared war on Serbia, which as a result, would of avoided the start of the Great War.
One of the most talked about, and main arguments from many historians of why alliances were to blame, was the encirclement of Germany and the Central Powers. Certain historians believe that the encirclement of Germany helped to create their Schlieffen plan, which, in turn, made it so Germany would have to go to war with both France and Russia, even if only one attacked.
This can be seen, when Germany declared war on Russia, and then only two days later declared war on France in August of This again, escalated, what could have been an isolated conflict, into a much larger World War. This encirclement promoted the arms race as well, leading again to the outbreak of WW1.
Germany started to feel threatened and as a result, started to build up their army. When the other countries in Europe saw this happening, they started to build up their forces as to defend themselves in case of a German attack.
Also, as a result of the encirclement by the Triple Entente, Germany felt that War was going to happen at one time or another, and the assassination was an excuse for it to happen sooner rather than later. One of the most glaring reasons why was that the alliances itself were very loose, in fact there were no military obligations in the Triple Entente.
This would of meant that Britain, France, and Russia, did not have to defend or help each other, and they were not by any stretch of the imagination fond of each other either. This means, something else led to them being dragged into the war, not the alliance system itself.
Recently, historians have started to argue that Britain got involved because of oil. Which was being led by the new dreadnaughts, which relied on a huge amount of oil at the time, as opposed to the old ships, which relied on coal.
This can be seen where Britain first sent their troops in When in reality, when Britain found out that Turkey supported Germany, they sent their troops to Iraq, where Turkey had a great presence. Iraq was where Britain obtained their oil, as they had none on its own island.
This rush to get to Iraq and secure their own oil supplies seems to be more important than the war that started a few days later in Europe, where the British Expeditionary Force landed. The BEF was even ill prepared for fighting and badly prepared. They only got involved when they invaded Belgium, which was a neutral country at the time.America's Great War: World War I and the American Experience.
Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, Stresses the home front. While French nationalists were hostile to Germany, which sought to maintain its gains by militarism and alliances, nationalism was creating violent tensions in the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy;.
The period between and saw a Europe that was considerably more stable than that of previous decades. To a large extent this was the product of the formation of new states in Germany and Italy, and political reformations in older, established states, such as Britain and Austria.
Nationalism, Militarism and Alliances at the Root of the Great War ( words, 1 pages) List and explain 3 Causes of the Great War? Some of any causes to a war happen with time. In many ways, this first world war represented a culmination of three great forces: nationalism, imperialism, and militarism.
Nationalism and imperialism. The rise of nationalism during the s produced much of the instability that led to the outbreak of World War I. The Origins of the War of (3 Volume Set) [Luigi Albertini, Isabella M.
Massey] on timberdesignmag.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Luigi Albertini wrote this monumental investigation into the origins of the First World War in the s. After our class discussion I believe that out of the four MAIN causes of World War I, nationalism is the only possible cause.
Although there are other causes of the war nationalism was a great factor and I believe it was the strongest of the four "main causes". but is still a result of militarism) and alliances. At the root of this.